Which wound dressing best protects knee replacements?

NCT ID NCT07770633

First seen Aug 18, 2026 ยท Last updated Aug 18, 2026

Summary

This trial compares three different negative-pressure wound dressings (NPseal, PICO, and Prevena) applied after total knee replacement surgery. The study enrolls adults at higher risk for wound problems, such as those with diabetes, obesity, or chronic kidney disease. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of the three dressings, and researchers track surgical site complications like infection or poor healing for 90 days. The goal is to see if one dressing performs better than the others in preventing these issues.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) devices (NPseal, PICO, Prevena) applied over the surgical incision after knee replacement surgery.
What this could lead to
If one device proves better, it could guide surgeons in choosing the best dressing to reduce wound complications after knee replacement, especially in high-risk patients.
What could go wrong
This is a single-center trial, and results may not apply to all hospitals or patients. Also, the study compares existing devices, so it won't introduce a brand-new treatment, and individual outcomes may vary.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.