CT scans could make heart stent surgery safer and faster
NCT ID NCT07286578
First seen Jan 05, 2026 · Last updated Jun 21, 2026 · Updated 22 times
Summary
This study tests whether using a CT scan to guide heart stent placement is better than the current standard (IVUS ultrasound) for people with hardened, calcified coronary arteries. About 700 adults with evidence of reduced blood flow to the heart will be randomly assigned to one of the two imaging methods. The goal is to see if CT guidance leads to better stent expansion and similar or fewer heart problems over time.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Bringham and Women's Hospital
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGBoston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
-
Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGNew York, New York, 10032, United States
-
HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH, Inc
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGJersey City, New Jersey, 08837, United States
-
Hospital Universitari Vall Hebron
RECRUITINGBarcelona, 08035, Spain
-
Hospital Universitario La Paz
RECRUITINGMadrid, 28046, Spain
-
Hospital Universitario de Leon
RECRUITINGLeón, Spain
-
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGOxford, United Kingdom
-
Minneapolis Heart Institute
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGMinneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States
-
Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundations Trust
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGNewcastle, United Kingdom
-
St Bartholomew's Hospital (Barts Health NHS Trust)
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLondon, United Kingdom
-
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundations Trust
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLondon, United Kingdom
-
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGLeicester, United Kingdom
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGNew York, New York, 14853, United States
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
Active substance
CT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (stent placement) compared to IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention
What this could lead to
If successful, CT guidance could make heart stent procedures faster and more effective for patients with calcified arteries, potentially reducing complications.
What could go wrong
This is a mid-stage trial with 700 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. CT guidance might not improve outcomes or could have unforeseen risks.
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.