CT scans could make heart stent surgery safer and faster

NCT ID NCT07286578

First seen Jan 05, 2026 · Last updated Jun 21, 2026 · Updated 22 times

Summary

This study tests whether using a CT scan to guide heart stent placement is better than the current standard (IVUS ultrasound) for people with hardened, calcified coronary arteries. About 700 adults with evidence of reduced blood flow to the heart will be randomly assigned to one of the two imaging methods. The goal is to see if CT guidance leads to better stent expansion and similar or fewer heart problems over time.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Bringham and Women's Hospital

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    New York, New York, 10032, United States

  • HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH, Inc

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Jersey City, New Jersey, 08837, United States

  • Hospital Universitari Vall Hebron

    RECRUITING

    Barcelona, 08035, Spain

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz

    RECRUITING

    Madrid, 28046, Spain

  • Hospital Universitario de Leon

    RECRUITING

    León, Spain

  • John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Oxford, United Kingdom

  • Minneapolis Heart Institute

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States

  • Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundations Trust

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Newcastle, United Kingdom

  • St Bartholomew's Hospital (Barts Health NHS Trust)

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    London, United Kingdom

  • St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundations Trust

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    London, United Kingdom

  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    Leicester, United Kingdom

  • Weill Medical College of Cornell University

    NOT_YET_RECRUITING

    New York, New York, 14853, United States

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

CT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (stent placement) compared to IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention

What this could lead to

If successful, CT guidance could make heart stent procedures faster and more effective for patients with calcified arteries, potentially reducing complications.

What could go wrong

This is a mid-stage trial with 700 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. CT guidance might not improve outcomes or could have unforeseen risks.

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Arterial Occlusive Diseases arteriosclerosis disorder cardiovascular disorder coronary artery disorder heart disorder myocardial ischemia vascular disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.