Heart attack stents face off: which heals better?
NCT ID NCT02890589
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at how well two types of stents (small mesh tubes) placed in heart arteries after a heart attack become covered by the body's own cells. 22 people who had a heart attack were randomly assigned to get either a SYNERGY stent or a bioresorbable scaffold. Doctors used a special camera inside the artery at 3 months to count how many parts of the stent were still uncovered. The goal was to see which device helps the artery heal faster.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Didier CARRIE
Toulouse, Toulouse, 31500, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which strategy wins for heart attack patients with multiple blocked arteries?
- Can a Plant-Based diet calm the immune system after a heart attack?
- Ultrasound 'Memory' imaging may reveal hidden heart ischemia
- Could a heart MRI replace invasive scans for some heart attacks?
- Can a tailored Blood-Thinner combo prevent second heart attacks without causing bleeding?
- Can a quick shot stop a heart attack in its tracks?