Could a simple chest monitor replace ultrasound for septic shock patients?

NCT ID NCT07321405

Not yet recruiting Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Assiut University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study will enroll 100 adults with septic shock to compare two non-invasive methods for measuring how well the heart is pumping blood: standard ultrasound (echocardiogram) and a newer device called electrical cardiometry, which uses sensors on the chest. The goal is to see if the simpler device is accurate and reliable enough for routine use in intensive care. The study does not test any drug or treatment.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If successful, this could show that a simpler, continuous monitoring device (electrical cardiometry) is reliable enough to replace or supplement standard ultrasound in septic shock patients.
What could go wrong: This is an early-stage observational study with only 100 participants. The new device may not prove accurate enough in real-world critical care, and results may not apply to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SEPTIC SHOCK are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

toxic shock syndrome

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

SEPTIC SHOCK

Contacts and locations

Locations

Assiut University Hospital

Asyut, 71511, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.