Can a simple interview accurately diagnose mental disorders? hong kong study aims to find out
NCT ID NCT07604753
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study checks how well a new version of a mental health interview (CIDI 5.0) can identify people who have had depression, anxiety, or PTSD at some point in their lives. Researchers in Hong Kong will interview 300 adults and compare the results with a detailed clinical assessment. The goal is to see if this tool can be trusted for large surveys.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could confirm that the CIDI 5.0 is a reliable tool for large-scale mental health surveys, helping researchers better understand how common these disorders are.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a treatment trial. It only tests the accuracy of a diagnostic interview, so it won't directly improve patient care. Results may not apply outside Hong Kong.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER (GAD) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
The University of Hong Kong
RECRUITINGHong Kong, Hong Kong
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can MDMA-Assisted therapy heal trauma in young adults?
- Can brain and blood data predict Anxiety's future?
- Can a daily microdose of psilocybin calm chronic anxiety?
- Can breathing exercises help veterans heal from trauma and addiction?
- Can couples counseling lift depression in women?
- Brain wave clues: could inflammation markers forecast ECT outcomes?