10-Year study aims to find safer gastric bypass technique

NCT ID NCT04930029

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University Hospital, Lille Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study follows 320 people who had omega gastric bypass surgery 10 years ago to compare long-term side effects between two surgical techniques (150 cm vs 200 cm loop). Researchers will check for serious complications, nutritional problems, and weight loss. The goal is to determine which method is safer over the long term.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Omega gastric bypass surgery (with 150 cm or 200 cm biliary limb)
What this could lead to: If successful, this study could help surgeons choose the safer type of omega gastric bypass, reducing long-term complications for people with obesity.
What could go wrong: This is an observational study, not a treatment trial, so it won't directly test a new therapy. Results may take years and might not apply to all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BYPASS COMPLICATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

gastroesophageal reflux disease Obesity obesity disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

BYPASS COMPLICATION OBESITY

Contacts and locations

Locations

Hôpital Claude Huriez - Service de chirurgie générale et endocrinienne
RECRUITING

Lille, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.