Knee replacement showdown: which implant helps you recover faster?

NCT ID NCT07595861

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 40 people who had knee replacement surgery to see if the type of implant affects recovery. One group got a cruciate-retaining implant, the other a posterior-stabilized implant. Researchers measured pain, function, fear of movement, quality of life, and how much patients 'forgot' about their new knee at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The goal is to help doctors choose the best implant for each patient.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
knee replacement surgery (cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized implant)
What this could lead to
If successful, this study could help surgeons choose the best implant type for faster recovery and better long-term function after knee replacement.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed observational study with only 40 participants. Results may not apply to all patients, and the study does not test a new drug or treatment.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ondokuz Mayis University

    Samsun, Atakum, 55270, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.