Can a cheaper plastic knee implant match the metal one in older adults?

NCT ID NCT02482493

First seen Jul 29, 2026 · Last updated Jul 30, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two types of knee replacement implants in people aged 75 and older: a standard metal-backed component and a cheaper all-polyethylene (plastic) one. The goal is to see if the all-polyethylene implant performs as well in terms of pain relief, movement, and how long it lasts. Participants are randomly assigned to receive one of the two implants and are followed for five years after surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
knee replacement implant (all-polyethylene tibial component vs metal-backed tibial component)
What this could lead to
If the all-polyethylene component performs as well as the metal-backed one, it could offer a more cost-effective option for knee replacement in older adults.
What could go wrong
This is a relatively small trial, and the all-polyethylene component may not be as durable or effective as the metal-backed version over the long term.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for INFLAMMATORY ARTHROPATHY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Trauma & Orthopaedic Dept, Tunbridge Wells Hospital

    Pembury, Kent, TN2 4QJ, United Kingdom

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.