Which scope spots trouble better? study tests two colonoscopy techniques for IBD patients
NCT ID NCT04191655
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 211 adults with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to see which colonoscopy method finds precancerous growths better: high-definition white light or dye spraying. Participants had IBD for at least eight years. The goal was to improve cancer screening in this higher-risk group.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for COLON DYSPLASIA are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
-
Lahey Hospital and Medical Center
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01803, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Sound waves vs. scope: a gentler way to spot pouch inflammation?
- Can we predict how kids with IBD will respond to treatment?
- Can switching IBD meds heal the gut when symptoms are quiet?
- Can a milk sugar tame IBD symptoms?
- Could an extra flu shot shield vulnerable kids?
- Can a glass of pomegranate juice tame gut inflammation?