No-Scalpel weight loss: new stomach burn procedure tested
NCT ID NCT05574777
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested a new, non-surgical weight loss technique called Gastric Mucosal Ablation (GMA) in 13 people with class III obesity. The procedure uses a device to carefully burn the stomach lining, aiming to mimic the hormonal effects of weight-loss surgery. The main goal was to check if the procedure is safe and feasible, with participants followed for 6 months.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Hybrid argon plasma coagulation (HybridAPC) device
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could offer a less invasive weight-loss option for people with severe obesity, avoiding the need for surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This was a very small, early feasibility study with only 13 participants. It focused on safety, not weight-loss effectiveness, so much more research is needed.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ADIPOSITY are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
São Paulo, Brazil
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a new stomach and gut bypass surgery tackle obesity and diabetes?
- Can a Two-Drug combo tip the scales against obesity?
- Can Weight-Loss surgery change how medications work?
- Coffee grounds probiotic could reshape gut health and fight inflammation
- Can shedding pounds reboot the Heart's exercise engine?
- Can stomach surgery alter how painkillers work?