Extra burns may keep heart rhythm steady in persistent AF
NCT ID NCT07424326
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two ablation procedures for people with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), a heart rhythm problem. Half of the 450 participants will get standard treatment (isolating the pulmonary veins), while the other half will get extra ablation lines in the heart. The goal is to see which approach better prevents AF from coming back over 12 months.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a smartphone alert replace daily blood thinners for AF?
- Blood fat clues could flag hidden heart rhythm risk
- Can a new heart ablation technique work without x-rays?
- Which blood thinner is safer for heart patients? a Head-to-Head test
- Smartphone light sensor may spot when an irregular heartbeat fixes itself
- Can a cholesterol drug keep atrial fibrillation at bay after ablation?