Robot guidance may improve knee replacement outcomes
NCT ID NCT06608745
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study compares two ways to perform total knee replacement: the standard manual technique versus one guided by computer-assisted navigation. Researchers will enroll 160 patients and measure pain, function, blood loss, and costs. The goal is to see if the computer-assisted method leads to better recovery and fewer complications.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- computer-assisted surgical navigation
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could show that computer-assisted knee surgery leads to better pain relief, function, and fewer complications than the standard approach.
- What could go wrong
- This is a relatively small, early-stage comparison study. The benefits of navigation may be small or not apply to all patients, and the technology adds time and cost.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GONARTHROSIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
RECRUITINGBologna, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New knee implant under Real-World scrutiny: will it deliver better outcomes?
- Knee replacement pain study aims to cut chronic pain risk
- Brain scans reveal why some knee pain feels different
- Ozone injection study: does concentration matter for knee pain?
- Smartphone surveys could replace paper forms for knee surgery Follow-Up
- Could a simple pill ease pain after knee surgery?