Heart rhythm crisis in sepsis: which strategy saves more lives?
NCT ID NCT04844801
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at 240 adults with septic shock who develop a new, fast heart rhythm problem. It compares three treatment approaches: controlling heart rate with low-dose amiodarone, restoring normal rhythm with high-dose amiodarone or electric shock, or managing risk factors without antiarrhythmic drugs. The goal is to see which strategy reduces death and shortens shock duration.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SEPTIC SHOCK are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation-Hôpital Tenon
RECRUITINGParis, 75020, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Blood markers may foretell brain fog after sepsis
- Can tracking immune chaos in sepsis reveal new treatment targets?
- Blood clot score may predict organ damage in septic shock
- Could a key hormone be missing in septic shock?
- Could a simple mineral cut the need for powerful blood-pressure drugs in septic shock?
- Blood filter could shield vessels in septic shock