Stroke study to settle anesthesia debate: sleep or sedate?
NCT ID NCT07235514
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at 958 people having a severe stroke to find out if general anesthesia (being fully asleep) or procedural sedation (being drowsy but breathing on your own) leads to better recovery after a procedure to remove a blood clot from the brain. Participants will be randomly assigned to one type of anesthesia and followed for 3 months to see how independent they are in daily life. The goal is to improve stroke care and outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE DUE TO ANTERIOR CIRCULATION LARGE VESSEL OCCLUSION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Zapping the brain to restore swallowing after stroke?
- Can Brain-Triggered stimulation reawaken arms after stroke?
- Soothing sounds may slash sedative doses during scopes
- Can lifestyle choices after a stroke extend life and prevent a second one?
- Can Clot-Removing devices improve stroke recovery?
- A tiny neck implant could catch Stroke-Causing clots before they reach the brain