Timing is everything: study probes whether delaying anal fistula surgery worsens outcomes

NCT ID NCT07482241

Not yet recruiting Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Assiut University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study will observe 90 adults with anal fistulas to see if the time between first symptoms and surgery affects healing and recurrence. Participants are grouped by how long they waited: 3 months or less, 3 to 6 months, or more than 6 months. Researchers will track healing, recurrence, complications, and quality of life for 12 months after surgery. The goal is to find the optimal timing for surgery to improve outcomes.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If successful, this study could help doctors and patients decide the best time to have anal fistula surgery, potentially improving healing and reducing the chance of the fistula coming back.
What could go wrong: This is an observational study, not a treatment trial. It will only show a link, not prove that timing causes better outcomes. Results may not apply to all patients or fistula types.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANAL FISTULA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

anal fistula

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

ANAL FISTULA ANAL FISTULA SURGERY SURGERY TIMING

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.