Laser vs. scalpel: which heals anal fistula faster?
NCT ID NCT07681531
First seen Jul 02, 2026 · Last updated Jul 02, 2026
Summary
This study compares two ways to treat uncomplicated perianal fistula: conventional open surgery (fistulectomy) and a newer laser ablation technique. About 72 adults with a single, simple fistula tract will be randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. Researchers will track how quickly each group returns to normal activities and whether the fistula comes back within six months.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Laser ablation
- What this could lead to
- If laser ablation works better, patients may recover faster and have a lower chance of the fistula coming back.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 72 people, so results may not apply to everyone. Laser ablation is still being tested and might not be better than standard surgery.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANAL FISTULA are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
PNS Hafeez Naval Hospital
Islamabad, 44400, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can stem cell vesicles heal Crohn's fistulas?
- Antibiotics after abscess drainage may block painful fistula formation
- Surgical glue may boost healing for tough anal fistulas
- Stem cell showdown: donor vs. your own fat for Crohn's fistulas
- Herbal capsules aim to ease Post-Surgery constipation without harsh side effects
- Anal fistula surgery showdown: which technique spares continence?