Which fluid guide works best for septic shock? ultrasound vs. NICOM showdown
NCT ID NCT07162857
First seen Sep 30, 2025 · Last updated May 16, 2026 · Updated 27 times
Summary
This study looked at 60 adults with septic shock in the emergency department to see if using ultrasound or a noninvasive heart monitor (NICOM) helps doctors give fluids more effectively. Both groups also received standard sepsis care. The goal was to see which method improves blood pressure, reduces complications, and lowers death rates within 28 days.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SEPTIC SHOCK are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Panyu Central Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.