New study tests smarter fluid delivery for septic shock patients

NCT ID NCT07162857

Completed Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Mai Xiaowei Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at two ways to guide fluid treatment in 60 emergency department patients with septic shock: using ultrasound or a noninvasive heart monitor. Both methods aim to give the right amount of fluids to improve blood pressure and organ function. Researchers tracked survival, complications, and hospital stay to see which approach works better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If successful, this study could show that using ultrasound or noninvasive cardiac monitoring helps doctors give the right amount of fluids to septic shock patients, potentially improving survival and reducing complications.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed study with only 60 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. The two monitoring methods may not differ significantly in outcomes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SEPTIC SHOCK are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

toxic shock syndrome

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

SEPTIC SHOCK

Contacts and locations

Locations

Panyu Central Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.