Knee replacement showdown: cemented vs. uncemented implants under scrutiny

NCT ID NCT02525601

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two versions of the Triathlon total knee prosthesis—one fixed with bone cement and one without—in 60 people with knee osteoarthritis. Researchers will use special X-ray techniques to see how well each implant stays in place over time, and also track patients' pain, function, and satisfaction. The goal is to find out which method leads to better long-term outcomes and fewer complications.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Triathlon total knee prosthesis (cemented and uncemented versions)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could help determine which type of knee implant (cemented or uncemented) provides better long-term stability and function for patients with osteoarthritis.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 60 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The main risk is that one implant type may loosen or fail over time, requiring revision surgery.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ARTHROPLASTY REPLACEMENT, KNEE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Skånevård Kryh Division Kirurgi och Ortopedkliniken Hässleholm

    Hässleholm, Skåne County, 281 38, Sweden

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.