Rotary bur vs piezo knife: which heals tooth bone better?

NCT ID NCT07197658

Ongoing Disease control Sponsor: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two ways to remove infection at the tip of a tooth root: using a rotary bur (a small drill) or a piezoelectric unit (a vibrating tool). 124 adults with root infections will have surgery and then be followed for 12 months to see which method leads to better bone healing. The goal is to find out if one technique helps the bone reform more completely.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: endodontic microsurgery (rotary bur or piezoelectric unit)
What this could lead to: If one method proves better, it could guide dentists to choose the technique that leads to faster or more complete bone healing after root surgery.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study (124 people) comparing surgical tools, not testing a new drug or cure. Results may not apply to all patients or guarantee better outcomes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ENDODONTIC MICROSURGERY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

periapical periodontitis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

ENDODONTIC MICROSURGERY OSTEOTOMY PERIAPICAL PERIODONTITIS

Contacts and locations

Locations

Private Dental Office

Athens, Attica, 11528, Greece
Spyros Floratos Private Dental Office

Athens, Attica, 11528, Greece

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.