Newer sedative faces off against propofol in heart patients
NCT ID NCT07829458
First seen Sep 21, 2026 · Last updated Sep 21, 2026
Summary
Researchers compare two sedatives, remimazolam and propofol, for patients with heart disease who need a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), a procedure that uses a tube in the esophagus to take pictures of the heart. Adults scheduled for an elective TEE receive one of the two drugs by IV, with doses adjusted to keep them comfortable. The study tracks how often blood pressure drops during the procedure, whether the TEE is completed successfully, how long recovery takes, and any side effects.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- remimazolam, a sedative drug, compared with propofol
- What this could lead to
- If remimazolam works as well as propofol with fewer blood pressure drops, it could become a preferred sedative for heart patients during TEE procedures.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-center study of 210 patients, so results may not apply to all hospitals or patient groups. Remimazolam can still cause low blood pressure or other side effects, and it may not prove better than propofol.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 4
Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.
- Participants
-
About 210 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Sep 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Sep 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * 18 years of age and older * all cardiac patients undergoing elective TEE examination Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with hypersensitivity to dextrans * Emergent procedures * Patient with allergy to any of the anesthetic agents * Patient refusal
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Anesthesia are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Mount Sinai Morningside
New York, New York, 10025, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a whiff of xenon replace the Pre-Surgery chill pill?
- Can a gentler anesthesia cocktail protect a child's developing brain?
- Which monitor reads a Child's pain best during surgery?
- Propofol vs. inhaled anesthesia: which one spares your recovery?
- Which epidural technique best handles a cesarean emergency?
- Which blood pressure drug spares the lungs during heart surgery?