Which monitor reads a Child's pain best during surgery?
NCT ID NCT07084935
First seen Sep 08, 2026 · Last updated Sep 09, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two devices that track pain signals in children under general anesthesia: the NOL index and the SPI. Both monitors read the body's automatic responses to pain, but they use different methods. Researchers will test how each monitor reacts to a standard pain pulse and to the actual start of surgery in 40 children aged 1 to 12. The goal is to see which device gives a clearer signal, which could help anesthesiologists manage pain more precisely in young patients.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Comparison of two monitoring devices: the Nociception Level (NOL) index and the Surgical Pleth Index (SPI), used during general anesthesia in children.
- What this could lead to
- If one monitor proves better at detecting pain in children under anesthesia, it could improve how doctors manage pain during surgery for young patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small observational study, so results may not apply to all children or surgeries. The monitors may not clearly differ in their ability to detect pain.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
40 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2025
- Finished
-
Jun 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
pediatric patients scheduled to undergo surgery with general anesthesia at the Radboud university medical centre in Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Ages
-
1 year to 12 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female * ASA I, ASA II and ASA III * Aged 1 to 12 years old * Scheduled to undergo elective surgery with general anaesthesia Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with chronic pain * Patients with chronic analgesia usage. * Known allergy to the adhesives used in the sensors. * No free available limb to attach the probes to.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Anesthesia are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Radboud university medical centre
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 GA, Netherlands
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Propofol vs. inhaled anesthesia: which one spares your recovery?
- Which epidural technique best handles a cesarean emergency?
- Could a sleep drug shield older hearts from post-surgery delirium?
- How do countries train anesthesia residents? a global snapshot
- Can a smart pump prevent dangerous drops in blood pressure during C-Sections?
- Can a ketamine boost during surgery slash opioid needs?