New heart mapping technique could improve ablation for persistent AF
NCT ID NCT07187115
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jul 30, 2026 · Updated 5 times
Summary
This global trial compares two ablation strategies for people with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) that hasn't responded to medication. One group gets standard ablation of the pulmonary veins and back wall of the left atrium. The other group gets ablation guided by a special mapping system (electrographic flow mapping) to target additional problem areas. The study aims to see if the mapping-guided approach is as safe and effective as the standard method. About 699 participants will be followed for one year.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Pulsed field ablation (a procedure using electrical pulses to destroy heart tissue causing abnormal rhythms)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could offer a more targeted and potentially safer ablation approach for people with persistent atrial fibrillation, reducing the need for repeat procedures.
- What could go wrong
- This is a large but early-stage comparison trial; the new mapping technique may not prove superior to the standard approach. As with any heart procedure, risks include bleeding, infection, or heart rhythm complications.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
AZORG
Aalst, 9300, Belgium
-
Arrhythmia Research Group
Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401, United States
-
Christus Trinity Mother Frances Health System
Tyler, Texas, 75701, United States
-
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
-
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008, Spain
-
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308, United States
-
Hartcentrum Hasselt Jessa Ziekenhuis Campus Virga Jesse
Hasselt, 3500, Belgium
-
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029, United States
-
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
-
Pacific Heart Institute
Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States
-
Piedmont Athens Regional
Athens, Georgia, 30606, United States
-
Prince of Wales Hosptial
Shatin, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
-
St. Luke's Boise Medical Center
Boise, Idaho, 83702, United States
-
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
-
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a smartphone alert replace daily blood thinners for AF?
- Blood fat clues could flag hidden heart rhythm risk
- Can a new heart ablation technique work without x-rays?
- Which blood thinner is safer for heart patients? a Head-to-Head test
- Smartphone light sensor may spot when an irregular heartbeat fixes itself
- Can a Wrist-Worn sensor outsmart atrial fibrillation?