Can a simple check replace High-Tech anesthesia monitoring?
NCT ID NCT07590388
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at whether a simple scoring method called PRST (which checks blood pressure, heart rate, sweating, and tears) can accurately measure how deep a patient's anesthesia is during surgery. 183 adults having elective surgery were monitored either with PRST alone or PRST plus a standard brain-wave monitor (BIS). The goal was to see if the simple method works as well as the high-tech one.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
RSUP Dr. Sardjito
Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a targeted nerve block cut opioid use in High-Risk C-Sections?
- Can a new sedative make anesthesia safer for seniors?
- Can a lighter sedative dose keep patients calm after nasal surgery?
- A single score may spot breathing trouble before it's too late in sedated children
- A dab of gel on the breathing tube might spare surgery patients a sore throat — a trial puts it to the test.
- Could a tiny Pre-Dose of muscle relaxant make anesthesia safer and faster?