Breathing tube before hospital: lifesaver or not?
NCT ID NCT07524881
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study examined 297 adults who had a cardiac arrest outside the hospital and were treated by emergency services. Researchers wanted to see if placing a breathing tube before arriving at the hospital helped more people survive for 28 days and have better brain function. They also looked at factors like bystander CPR and heart rhythm to understand what improves outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARDIAC ARREST (CA) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Sultangazi, Istanbul, 34265, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Blood test may forecast brain recovery after cardiac arrest
- A needle in the neck to shock the heart back to life?
- Can a camera guide safer breathing tubes during endoscopy?
- Can tracking body heat during cardiac arrest improve survival?
- Can a High-Tech CPR bundle boost heart restart rates?
- Can emergency response predict heart restart? a new study investigates