Can a gentler root canal save more tooth and still heal infection?

NCT ID NCT07762248

First seen Aug 13, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial asks whether a minimally invasive root canal procedure can match the success of the traditional approach in treating lower molars with dead nerves and an infected root tip. Sixty adults aged 20 to 50 with such molars will be randomly assigned to receive either a conservative or a standard root canal treatment. Over 12 months, the study will compare how well each method clears infection and promotes bone healing around the tooth root.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Root canal treatment (minimally invasive vs traditional procedure)
What this could lead to
If minimally invasive root canal treatment works as well as the traditional approach, it could preserve more natural tooth structure and improve recovery for people with infected molars.
What could go wrong
This is a relatively small trial, and the minimally invasive approach may not disinfect the root canals as effectively, potentially leading to a higher risk of persistent infection or treatment failure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for APICAL PERIODONTITIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Faculty of dentistry, Assiut university

    Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.