Which hand position saves tiny lives? study pits four infant CPR techniques Head-to-Head

NCT ID NCT07698340

First seen Jul 13, 2026 · Last updated Jul 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares four different chest compression techniques for infant CPR using a manikin. Emergency medicine residents will perform two minutes of CPR with each technique—two-finger, three-finger, heel-of-one-hand, and two-thumb—in a random order. Researchers measure compression depth, rate, release speed, and how many compressions hit the target range, along with rescuer fatigue and difficulty. The goal is to identify which technique is most effective and least tiring for a single rescuer.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If one technique clearly outperforms others, it could inform future CPR guidelines for infants, potentially improving survival rates in real emergencies.
What could go wrong
This is a simulation study on manikins, not real infants, so results may not fully translate to actual resuscitation scenarios. The sample is limited to resident physicians at one hospital.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARDIAC ARREST (CA) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • AnkaraCHBilkent

    Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.