Which hand position saves tiny lives? study pits four infant CPR techniques Head-to-Head
NCT ID NCT07698340
First seen Jul 13, 2026 · Last updated Jul 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares four different chest compression techniques for infant CPR using a manikin. Emergency medicine residents will perform two minutes of CPR with each technique—two-finger, three-finger, heel-of-one-hand, and two-thumb—in a random order. Researchers measure compression depth, rate, release speed, and how many compressions hit the target range, along with rescuer fatigue and difficulty. The goal is to identify which technique is most effective and least tiring for a single rescuer.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If one technique clearly outperforms others, it could inform future CPR guidelines for infants, potentially improving survival rates in real emergencies.
- What could go wrong
- This is a simulation study on manikins, not real infants, so results may not fully translate to actual resuscitation scenarios. The sample is limited to resident physicians at one hospital.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
116 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2024
- Finished
-
Jan 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Resident physicians working in the Emergency Medicine Clinic of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital. * Voluntary agreement to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of a musculoskeletal disorder or disability that could interfere with CPR performance. * Unwillingness to participate.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cardiac arrest (CA) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
AnkaraCHBilkent
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Blood tests in the ambulance: a new study probes early brain injury markers
- Could a 2-Second longer pause in CPR save more hearts?
- Can augmented reality coach better CPR than a human?
- Wearable ECG patch could unlock hidden heart risks
- Could better phone training save more cardiac arrest victims?
- Can head position and cooling boost brain recovery after cardiac arrest?