Could skipping the breathing tube make heart transplants safer?

NCT ID NCT07758894

First seen Aug 11, 2026 · Last updated Aug 12, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two anesthesia approaches for adults undergoing heart transplantation: a newer method that avoids routine breathing tubes and lets patients breathe on their own sooner, versus conventional anesthesia with a breathing tube. The goal is to see if the gentler method reduces major heart and lung complications and shortens recovery time. About 300 participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two approaches and followed for up to a year.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Non-intubated spontaneous ventilation anesthesia (NISVA) using a supraglottic airway, compared with conventional endotracheal general anesthesia
What this could lead to
If successful, this approach could make heart transplant surgery safer and speed up recovery by reducing breathing-related complications.
What could go wrong
This is an early-stage trial, and the less invasive method may not suit all patients. Safety risks could require switching to standard anesthesia during surgery.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEART TRANSPLANT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

    RECRUITING

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 450051, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.