Could Hands-Only CPR be just as good as standard CPR?

NCT ID NCT03981107

First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two types of CPR for people who have a cardiac arrest outside a hospital: hands-only CPR (chest compressions without rescue breaths) versus standard CPR (compressions plus rescue breaths). The trial will include over 3,000 adults whose cardiac arrest is witnessed and who have a bystander with prior CPR training. The goal is to see if hands-only CPR is at least as effective as standard CPR at helping people survive for 30 days.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Chest compression only CPR (hands-only CPR)
What this could lead to
If hands-only CPR works as well as standard CPR, it could simplify training and encourage more bystanders to act, potentially saving more lives from cardiac arrest.
What could go wrong
This is a large trial, but it only includes trained bystanders and witnessed arrests. Results may not apply to all situations, and hands-only CPR might be less effective for certain causes of cardiac arrest.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARDIAC ARREST are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

cardiac arrest Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • AREU, Agenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza

    RECRUITING

    Bergamo, Italy

  • SOS Alarm AB

    RECRUITING

    Stockholm, Sweden

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.