New electric pulse method tested for stubborn heart rhythm disorder

NCT ID NCT06134752

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two types of ablation—pulse field and radiofrequency—for treating persistent atrial fibrillation, a common heart rhythm problem. Fifty participants will receive one of the two procedures to isolate faulty electrical areas in the heart. The goal is to see which method creates longer-lasting isolation and better controls abnormal heart rhythms over a year.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Pulse field ablation and radiofrequency ablation
What this could lead to
If pulse field ablation proves more durable, it could offer a more effective, safer option for controlling persistent atrial fibrillation.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage comparison (50 participants) with no phase designation, so results may not be conclusive or widely applicable. Both procedures carry risks like bleeding or heart tissue damage.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LONGSTANDING PERSISTENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Cardiovascular Surgery Department, University Medical Centre Ljubljana

    Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.