Could ultrasound replace X-Rays in heart valve surgery?

NCT ID NCT07317804

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tests whether using only ultrasound (echocardiography) to guide a minimally invasive heart valve replacement is as effective as the standard method that combines X-ray and ultrasound. The goal is to reduce kidney injury from contrast dye and lower radiation exposure. About 212 patients aged 70+ with severe aortic stenosis will be randomly assigned to one of the two guidance methods.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Echocardiographic guidance (ultrasound) vs fluoroscopic guidance (X-ray) during TAVR procedure
What this could lead to
If successful, echo-only guidance could become a safer alternative for TAVR, reducing kidney damage and radiation exposure for patients.
What could go wrong
This is a Phase 4 trial with 212 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Echo-only guidance may be less precise in some cases, potentially affecting valve placement.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AORTIC STENOSIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.