Which ventilator setting saves more lungs? a Head-to-Head test

NCT ID NCT07741916

First seen Aug 03, 2026 · Last updated Aug 04, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares different bedside methods for choosing the optimal ventilator pressure (PEEP) in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The goal is to see if these methods give similar results and which one best balances keeping lungs open while avoiding overstretching. Researchers will analyze data from 45 ICU patients on mechanical ventilation, measuring lung mechanics and oxygenation at various PEEP levels. The findings could help standardize how doctors set ventilator pressure for ARDS patients.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Different PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) levels set via various bedside assessment tools
What this could lead to
If successful, this could identify the most reliable bedside method to set ventilator pressure, potentially improving outcomes for ARDS patients.
What could go wrong
This is a small observational study, so results may not apply broadly. The methods may not be interchangeable, and no single approach may emerge as clearly superior.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • CHU de Nice

    Nice, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.