New trial tests smarter bladder cancer surgery to save Men's sexual health

NCT ID NCT05792722

First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two surgical approaches for removing the bladder in men with bladder cancer: prostate capsule-sparing and nerve-sparing. The goal is to see which technique better preserves erectile function and urinary control. Seventy men will be randomly assigned to one of the two procedures and will complete questionnaires about their sexual and urinary health over time.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Prostate capsule-sparing radical cystectomy and nerve-sparing radical cystectomy
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that a prostate-sparing surgery helps men maintain better erectile and urinary function after bladder removal, without increasing cancer risk.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial (70 participants) comparing two surgical procedures. It is not testing a new drug or cure, and results may not apply to all bladder cancer patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BLADDER CANCER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

urinary bladder carcinoma Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Johns Hopkins Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States

  • Sibley Memorial Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.