Anal fistula surgery: which technique works best? new study aims to find out
NCT ID NCT07477496
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study follows 100 adults who need surgery for an anal fistula. Researchers will track healing, recurrence, and quality of life for one year after the procedure. The goal is to see which surgical methods work best in real-world settings. No new treatments are being tested—only standard care techniques.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help doctors choose the best surgical approach for perianal fistulas, improving patient outcomes and quality of life.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a controlled trial, so results may not prove one surgery is better than another. It is small (100 people) and only follows patients for one year.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANAL FISTULA are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Ippokrateio Hospital
RECRUITINGAthens, Greece
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can stem cell vesicles heal Crohn's fistulas?
- Antibiotics after abscess drainage may block painful fistula formation
- Laser vs. scalpel: which heals anal fistula faster?
- Surgical glue may boost healing for tough anal fistulas
- Stem cell showdown: donor vs. your own fat for Crohn's fistulas
- Herbal capsules aim to ease Post-Surgery constipation without harsh side effects