Gel boosts gum disease treatment? small study investigates
NCT ID NCT07672665
First seen Jun 29, 2026 · Last updated Jun 30, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looks at whether a special gel, called Sterify Gel, can improve the results of standard non-surgical gum disease treatment. Researchers will review records from 20 adults with moderate to severe periodontitis who received deep cleaning plus the gel. The main goal is to see if the gel helps reduce the depth of gum pockets more than cleaning alone.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Sterify Gel (mucoadhesive polymeric hydrogel)
- What this could lead to
- If effective, this gel could become a simple add-on to standard gum disease treatment, helping to reduce deep gum pockets without surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, retrospective study with only 20 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. The gel's benefit over standard care alone is not yet proven.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 20 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Jun 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Adult patients with stage II, III, or IV periodontitis treated at the Periodontal Unit of the Dental Department, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. Patients included in the study received non-surgical periodontal therapy with scaling and root planing/minimally invasive non-surgical therapy plus local application of a mucoadhesive polymeric hydrogel into periodontal pockets with probing depth greater than 4 mm. The analysis will be based on anonymized retrospective clinical records collected from January 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025.
- Ages
-
18 to 100 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients aged \>18 years * Diagnosis of stage II, III, or IV periodontitis * Non-smokers * Negative medical history * Patients treated with scaling and root planing/minimally invasive non-surgical periodontal therapy plus mucoadhesive polymeric hydrogel * Patients enrolled in supportive periodontal care Exclusion Criteria: * Smokers * Pregnancy * Surgical re-treatment during the maintenance period
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Periodontitis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a pill replace an IV for gum surgery pain relief?
- Can everyday supplements boost gum disease therapy?
- Can pulling a loose tooth and putting it back save it?
- Gum fluid proteins eyed as link between smoking and periodontitis
- Gum fluid holds clues to Behçet's disease puzzle
- Magnifying the fight against gum disease: loupe vs microscope