Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Which test is better for detecting h. pylori?

NCT ID NCT06684860

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two methods for diagnosing H. pylori infection: the rapid urease test (a simple, cheap test done during endoscopy) and a newer molecular test (PCR) that can also detect antibiotic resistance. Researchers enrolled 100 adults who needed an endoscopy. The goal was to see which test is more accurate. Results may help doctors choose the best diagnostic approach.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

100 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Nov 2024

Finished

Dec 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

H. pylori-infected patients

Ages

20 to 80 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Gastroscopy can be performed * H. pylori test and pathological analysis can be performed Exclusion Criteria: * Age \< 20 or \> 80 years * Anemia (serum hemoglobin level \< 10 g/dL) * Severe systemic disease * Advanced chronic liver disease * Use of certain medications, including proton pump inhibitors, H2- receptor antagonists, or antibiotics * History of H. pylori eradication * Drug allergy to antibiotics * History of gastric surgery * Recent history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for H.pylori infection are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital

    Seoul, 04401, South Korea

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.