Which test is better for detecting h. pylori?
NCT ID NCT06684860
First seen Apr 23, 2026 · Last updated May 12, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compared two methods to diagnose H. pylori infection: the rapid urease test (a simple, cheap test done during endoscopy) and a molecular test (which detects the bacteria's DNA). Researchers enrolled 100 people who needed an endoscopy. The goal was to see which test works better. Results help doctors choose the best diagnostic tool.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for H PYLORI INFECTION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital
Seoul, 04401, South Korea
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.