Which test is better for detecting h. pylori?
NCT ID NCT06684860
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two methods for diagnosing H. pylori infection: the rapid urease test (a simple, cheap test done during endoscopy) and a newer molecular test (PCR) that can also detect antibiotic resistance. Researchers enrolled 100 adults who needed an endoscopy. The goal was to see which test is more accurate. Results may help doctors choose the best diagnostic approach.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for H.PYLORI INFECTION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital
Seoul, 04401, South Korea
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- New Two-Drug combo shows promise against stomach bug
- New stomach bug treatment shows promise in 14-Day trial
- Stomach bug treatment may lower bleeding risk for heart patients
- Scientists map h. Pylori's resistance to antibiotics
- Argon plasma zaps stomach bugs in new trial
- Can a daily yogurt beat stomach bugs in kids?