3D-Printed vs. milled splints: which feels better in your mouth?
NCT ID NCT07236294
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 13, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study will test whether 3D-printed or milled occlusal splints are more comfortable and stable for healthy adults. Twenty-four participants will try both types and report how they feel. Dentists will also evaluate the fit. The goal is to learn which method works best for future dental care.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- occlusal splint (3D-printed or milled)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help dentists choose the better manufacturing method for splints, improving patient comfort and care.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study with only 24 healthy participants, so results may not apply to everyone or lead to immediate changes in practice.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
30 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2026
- Finished
-
Jul 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
The population for this prospective clinical randomized crossover trial, will consist of young adult participants aged 18 to 45, which study Dentistry, or are a co-worker or patient at the Dentistry Department of Radboudumc Nijmegen.
- Ages
-
18 to 45 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects being healthy (ASA \<IV) * Subjects with healthy, complete dentitions (except for extractions of wisdom teeth, or tooth extractions for the purpose of orthodontic treatment in the past) * Subjects willing and able to participate in the study * Subjects willing to provide written informed consent for their participation in the study Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects with dental issues other than the inclusion criteria * Subjects with a history of autoimmune disorder * Subjects with known allergies to acrylic materials * Subjects with severe allergies manifested by a history of anaphylaxis or those with severe, chronic allergies (e.g., asthma) and subjects with an active infection of any kind at the time of enrollment * Subjects who are pregnant or lactating * Subjects enrolled in another investigational clinical trial
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Retention are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
RadboudUMC
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 EX, Netherlands
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- The battle of the retainers: which one holds the line?
- Could a simple dental sealant plus remineralizer stop cavities in their tracks?
- Lab test reveals best cleaners for High-Tech dentures
- Face shape may predict how teeth shift after braces
- Diabetes drug could boost dental implant success
- Gymnastics beginners may jump higher with the right balance training