3D-Printed vs. milled splints: which feels better in your mouth?

NCT ID NCT07236294

Completed Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Radboud University Medical Center Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 13, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study will test whether 3D-printed or milled occlusal splints are more comfortable and stable for healthy adults. Twenty-four participants will try both types and report how they feel. Dentists will also evaluate the fit. The goal is to learn which method works best for future dental care.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: occlusal splint (3D-printed or milled)
What this could lead to: If successful, this could help dentists choose the better manufacturing method for splints, improving patient comfort and care.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study with only 24 healthy participants, so results may not apply to everyone or lead to immediate changes in practice.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for RETENTION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

juvenile polyp

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

RETENTION STABILITY WEAR COMFORT

Contacts and locations

Locations

RadboudUMC

Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 EX, Netherlands

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.