Dental implant showdown: which material fends off bacteria better?

NCT ID NCT06075017

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Universidad Complutense de Madrid Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This pilot study compares how much bacteria (biofilm) builds up on zirconia versus titanium dental implants. Researchers will place 15 zirconia and 15 titanium single implants in 40 patients and measure biofilm levels, gum health, and bone loss at 3, 6, and 12 months. The goal is to see if one material leads to fewer infections and better long-term outcomes.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: dental implant (zirconia or titanium)
What this could lead to: If zirconia implants collect less harmful bacteria, they could reduce the risk of implant infections and improve long-term dental implant success.
What could go wrong: This is a small pilot study with only 40 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The findings are observational and won't directly prove which material is better for all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for IMPLANT INFECTION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

prosthesis-related infectious disease

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

IMPLANT INFECTION

Contacts and locations

Locations

Complutense University of Madrid
RECRUITING

Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.