Heart procedure goes Radiation-Free: two techniques face off
NCT ID NCT07028502
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two methods for a key step in atrial fibrillation ablation—puncturing the wall between heart chambers—without using any X-rays. Both techniques used ultrasound instead. The trial involved 28 patients and measured how long each method took, whether X-rays were needed, and if any complications occurred. The goal was to see which technique is safer and more efficient, and to help doctors learn how to perform the procedure without radiation.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help establish safer, radiation-free methods for heart procedures.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 28 participants, so results may not apply widely. No new treatment is being tested.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
National Taiwan University Hospita
Taipei, 100, Taiwan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a smartphone alert replace daily blood thinners for AF?
- Blood fat clues could flag hidden heart rhythm risk
- Can a new heart ablation technique work without x-rays?
- Which blood thinner is safer for heart patients? a Head-to-Head test
- Smartphone light sensor may spot when an irregular heartbeat fixes itself
- Can a Wrist-Worn sensor outsmart atrial fibrillation?