Which heals better below the knee? stitches vs. natural healing
NCT ID NCT05074212
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at two methods for healing skin wounds below the knee after surgery: closing the wound with stitches (complex linear closure) or letting it heal naturally (second intention). The goal was to see which method gives a better-looking scar and improves quality of life. One person took part, and the results will help doctors choose the best approach for future patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for WOUND HEAL are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University of California, Davis, Department of Dermatology
Sacramento, California, 95816, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a special dressing make skin grafts unnecessary for burns?
- Can tiny skin grafts heal wounds without leaving a second scar?
- Can a placental patch help heal stubborn diabetic foot ulcers?
- Emergency wound study aims to predict which stitches will fail
- Smartphone app could let diabetic foot ulcer patients skip clinic visits for wound checks
- Gum healing boost? scientists test hyaluronic acid and polynucleotides