Which catheter holder is best? new study aims to reduce pain and infections
NCT ID NCT07093437
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether adhesive or elastic band devices are better at securing urinary catheters in critically ill patients. The goal is to prevent skin injuries, reduce discomfort, and lower the risk of catheter-related infections. About 188 adults in intensive care will be randomly assigned to one of the two devices and monitored closely.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 188 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Sep 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Oct 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 99 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age \> 18 years * Pacients with an urinary catheter inserted within the past 24 hours * Expected duration of catheterization \>48 hours * Estimated ICU lenght os stay \> 48 hours Exclusion Criteria: * Known allergy to adhesive tape * Patients with lesions at the urinary meatus, ongoing urinary tract infection or suspected infection * Presence of urological or prostatic pathology * Any condition that prevents securing the urinary catheter to the thigh, such as wounds, burns, or amputations
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Catheter-associated urinary tract infection are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Institut de Recerca Sant Pau
RECRUITINGBarcelona, 08024, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Five simple signs could help nurses score surgical pain in turkish
- Can green light glasses take the sting out of surgery?
- Can a Hands-On nerve technique ease Fibromyalgia's grip?
- Fixing broken ribs with surgery may cut pain better than drugs alone
- Could a Patient's playlist take the sting out of nerve testing?
- Scientists probe the mental steps behind rating your pain