Which kidney stone surgery is safer for your ureter? a large study investigates

NCT ID NCT07767773

First seen Aug 17, 2026 ยท Last updated Aug 17, 2026

Summary

This study looks back at adults who had surgery for kidney stones up to 20 mm, comparing those who had a ureteral access sheath placed during the procedure with those who did not. The goal is to see whether using the sheath affects the risk of developing a narrowed ureter or hydronephrosis (kidney swelling) at least a year later. By reviewing medical records and inviting patients for follow-up, researchers hope to identify which approach is safer for long-term kidney and urinary tract health.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Ureteral access sheath-assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) versus sheathless RIRS
What this could lead to
If the sheath is found to be safer, it could guide surgeons to choose the approach that reduces the risk of long-term ureteral damage after kidney stone surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a retrospective study, so it can only show associations, not proof. Results may be affected by differences between patient groups, and the follow-up is at least 12 months, which may not capture all long-term complications.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HYDRONEPHROSIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Department of Urology, Al-Hussein and Sayed Galal University Hospitals, Al-Azhar University

    Cairo, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.