Jaw pain study: which injection method wins?
NCT ID NCT07316790
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two methods of injecting medicine into the jaw joint to relieve pain and improve function: one using a tiny camera (arthroscopy) and the other using ultrasound guidance. About 50 adults with long-term jaw pain will take part. The goal is to see which approach offers better pain relief and easier recovery.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ARTHROSCOPE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
facility of Dentistry
Cairo, Old Cairo, 12613, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a simple joint wash beat botox for jaw pain?
- Could a Blood-Derived injection ease jaw pain without surgery?
- Blood-Derived injection may ease jaw pain better than steroids
- Real-Time MRI captures jaw joint motion to unlock TMJ disorder mysteries
- New laser zaps TMJ pain in small trial
- Can tiny injections ease jaw pain? new study says maybe