Dental bone graft showdown: which material keeps your jaw stronger?

NCT ID NCT07565558

Completed Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Medical University of Silesia Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested two different materials used to preserve the jawbone after a tooth is pulled. Forty adults received either a cow-derived bone graft or a human donor bone graft. Researchers measured how much the bone changed in size and density over six months using 3D scans. The goal was to see which material better maintains bone for future dental implants.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: socket preservation with xenograft (Geistlich Bio-Oss) or allograft
What this could lead to: If one material proves better, it could improve future dental implant success by preserving more bone after tooth extraction.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study with only 40 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The materials are already used in dentistry, so no major new risks are expected.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ALLOGRAFT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

ALLOGRAFT ALVEOLAR RIDGE PRESERVATION EXTRACTION SOCKET HEALING SOCKET PRESERVATION XENOGRAFT

Contacts and locations

Locations

"Comfortmed" dental clinic

Żory, Silesian Voivodeship, 44-240, Poland
Department of Oral Surgery of the Medical University of Silesia in Bytom

Bytom, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-902, Poland

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.