Spine mobilization showdown: which technique eases back pain best?

NCT ID NCT07177040

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study will compare two hands-on therapy techniques—SNAG and Maitland—for treating chronic non-specific low back pain. Sixty adults aged 25-40 with pain lasting over three months will receive one of the treatments three times a week for four weeks. Researchers will measure pain, disability, flexibility, and balance right after treatment and again four weeks later.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

Manual therapy techniques (SNAG and Maitland mobilizations)

What this could lead to

If one technique proves more effective, it could provide a better non-drug option for easing chronic low back pain and improving mobility.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage study with only 60 participants. Results may not apply to everyone, and the benefits might be modest or short-lived.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN (NSLBP) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • University Medical Clinics

    Ha'il, 0000, Saudi Arabia

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-••••