Which exercise works best for back pain? new trial aims to find out
NCT ID NCT07659327
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This clinical trial will compare Sahrmann exercises and McGill exercises in 42 adults with non-specific low back pain. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two exercise programs, alongside standard physical therapy. The study aims to see which approach better reduces pain, improves disability, and increases spinal range of motion.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- exercise programs (Sahrmann exercises and McGill exercises)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could show which exercise approach is better for easing low back pain and improving daily function.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 42 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Exercise benefits can vary widely between individuals.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN (NSLBP) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Stretch away the ache: new study tests psoas technique for Cleaners' back pain
- New exercise method shows promise for back pain in young adults
- New injection could offer quick relief for acute back pain
- Electric needles could replace painkiller shots for back pain
- Digital workouts tested as back pain relief
- New study tests simple hip and leg moves for back pain relief