Which shoulder surgery is better for arthritis? new study aims to find out

NCT ID NCT07226388

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two types of shoulder replacement surgery for people with glenohumeral osteoarthritis: hemiarthroplasty with a pyrocarbon implant and total shoulder arthroplasty. Researchers will track 74 participants for 10 years to see which surgery provides better pain relief and function. The goal is to help surgeons and patients make more informed treatment decisions.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

Hemiarthroplasty with pyrocarbon (device) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (device)

What this could lead to

If successful, this could help doctors choose the best surgical option for shoulder osteoarthritis, potentially improving pain relief and function.

What could go wrong

This is a relatively small study (74 people) and results may not apply to everyone. Surgery always carries risks like infection or implant failure.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

osteoarthritis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Washington University

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States