Shorter radiation may be as good for prostate cancer

NCT ID NCT02339701

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of radiation therapy for low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer in Asian men. One method, SBRT, delivers high-dose radiation in fewer sessions, while the other, IMRT, uses more standard daily doses. The main goal is to see which approach better preserves quality of life and controls the cancer.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

radiation therapy (SBRT or IMRT)

What this could lead to

If SBRT works as well as IMRT with fewer side effects, it could become a shorter, more convenient treatment option for prostate cancer.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-phase study with only 68 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Both treatments carry risks of urinary and bowel side effects.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

prostate adenocarcinoma prostate cancer

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital

    Hong Kong, Hong Kong